I've been reading Asimov lately, and consequently thinking about space colonization. One of the most often-cited barriers to human colonization of extraterrestrial worlds is the presumed lack of volunteers willing to make a one-way journey to another planet; it seems too conclusive, a course of action only the deeply desperate or truly dissatisfied would be willing to undertake. (Fortunately for human rights, but unfortunately for space colonization, penal colonies -- the interplanetary version of 19th century Australia -- don't seem to be a viable option.)
It seems, however, that not everyone shares said pessimism about human civilization beyond Earth:
http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20120206-space-tourists-one-way-mars-trip
There are a number of examples of migration and settlement in human history that may be considered analogues of space colonization. The Thirteen Colonies, for example, were populated by settlers who never expected to return to their lands of origin, and who were largely unable to communicate with family and friends from their precolonial lives (a product of distance, the unreliability of mail delivery, and illiteracy). And yet, there was no shortage of people willing to make the trip -- there were convicts and bondsmen, to be sure, but also religious minorities, merchants, speculators, explorers, and all manner of people who believed that they could build a better life in the uncharted wilderness than in the known, civilized world. I don't believe that this strain of optimism and curiosity will have disappeared between then and whenever we are capable of sending colonists beyond our orbit.
Would I go? I must admit: probably not. I have too many Earthly attachments -- people, places, moments, experiences (especially people). I would have been reluctant, I think, even in the later eras of immigration by ship; see the song "Kilkelly." It's no coincidence that so many of the early colonists in North America were particularly fervent Protestants who believed that one's mortal existence was ultimately inconsequential (predestination, and the complete rejection of Catholic belief in deed as well as faith), or people with few ties to their original communities, for varying definitions of community. But in an age of faster interplanetary travel, I'd sure love to visit!
Also, I think the idea of sending a few intrepid journalists to document the development of the Martian colony is brilliant. It's not often that we get to study the development of a nascent civilization, and it would prove instructive to have such a chronicle on hand once the colonization of space really begins.
The article mentions a hypothetical poll; I would be very interested to see the results of that particular study. I'm especially curious as to the demographics of an all-volunteer Martian colony, and whether they would reflect a population roughly comparable to the New World colonists.
Showing posts with label Mars. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mars. Show all posts
Friday, June 21, 2013
Thursday, June 3, 2010
BBC: Volunteer Cosmonauts begin 18-Month Mars Simulation
Prepping for a Mars mission!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science_and_environment/10197470.stm
It sounds... strangely fun. (This from a girl who would consider hiding in a tree for a year and writing a book, mind you.)
Also... a Mars mission! A whole slew of middle school sci-fi daydreams are coming true. Don't we live in interesting times?
(Five nerd points if you get the reference.)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science_and_environment/10197470.stm
It sounds... strangely fun. (This from a girl who would consider hiding in a tree for a year and writing a book, mind you.)
Also... a Mars mission! A whole slew of middle school sci-fi daydreams are coming true. Don't we live in interesting times?
(Five nerd points if you get the reference.)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)