A very interesting Opinions piece on the precarious position of Islam in America:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/16/opinion/16douthat.htmlIt makes a very good point. America is a land of immigrants, but only to a point. We are an Anglo-normative nation, a Judeo-Christian society that prints "In God we trust" on our currency and proclaims "one nation, under God" in our pledge. Whosoever believes in a different god, or even (in this case) the same God by a different name in a different book, sometimes isn't
quite American enough.
We profess to be a nation of religious freedom and cultural acceptance. We profess to have left behind our very embarrassing history of discrimination. We profess to welcome those of all colors and creeds. But in reality, with the World Trade Center mosque controversy and other instances of skittish xenophobia on the part of the white Judeo-Christian majority, we have a long ways to go towards those ideals.
At the same time, those same immigrants, being now a part of America, must also contribute to the growth process. The parties facing the steepest opposition must needs contribute the most. It is not fair, but it is
necessary. It reminds me of the differences between the strategies of Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X; while there is no denying that blacks should have had the same rights and freedoms as other Americans, the relevant legislation was achieved through nonviolent, costly, and arduous means. African-Americans
should not have needed to do that -- they ought to have enjoyed the same rights as anyone else -- but it was necessary. Malcolm X, for all his agitation and righteous indignation, which were justified, did not achieve nearly the results that King did.
I guess it all boils down to a bit of common sense: while it is certainly within one's rights to say needlessly provocative things (to a point; see "
Shouting 'Fire!' in a Crowded Theater"), it's often not beneficial to one's cause to say them (and this is a reality, no matter how one assigns the blame). What would you rather do, freely exercise your rights, or advance your cause by watching your mouth a little more carefully? The former is a Constitutionally protected right, but, in light of an unfortunate reality, it's also very selfish.